August 10th, 2009
Mountain Time 81
My apologies if someone knows of a way in which math and/or spoons are subjective.
My apologies if someone knows of a way in which math and/or spoons are subjective.
August 10th, 2009 at 2:53 am
I can’t believe how rude Socrates the Turkey was to Bertram. He only managed to speak one sentence, and even that was cut off by the Turkey. Also, I don’t know why you would trust a table. I mean seriously, they’re known to be superficial backstabbers.
August 10th, 2009 at 2:41 pm
Tables are indeed quite dastardly…
August 10th, 2009 at 3:07 pm
It’s all good to talk about parts of a spoon, but how much more interesting are the parts of a spork. The guy in the five part special should’ve used a spork to get the K off his forehead. I mean, sporks are not as convenient as forks, and are terrible spoons. Seriously, try eating soup with a spork. Those things are pointless. Just ask the Notorious Hamster. He turned me on to this conspiracy.
August 10th, 2009 at 5:52 pm
Yeah, that’s why Socrates the Turkey doesn’t get invited places much. Were he here right now, he’d be all, “What is a spork? Is it a spark at the quantum level?”
And just when you’d be about to interject with a tidbit linking sporks to Shrodinger’s cat in that–hot crackers!–it’s both a fork and a spoon at once, the way the cat is alive and dead at once, StT would just be all, “Does it truly take only a spark to get a fire going? Isn’t some kind of fuel necessary? What is quantum fuel? Do they sell chips and beer at quantum gas stations?”
Aw crud, I should’ve saved that quantum spork joke for a comic.